Epic Research is not viewable using Internet Explorer. Please try accessing it with an alternate browser.
Cosmos Study

Projected Colorectal Cancer Detection Rates in Adults Under Age 45

June 18, 2026
Dual-Team Study
Team A:Kersten Bartelt, RNTed Stamp
Team B:Dave Little, MDEric Barkley

Key Findings

  • Based on colorectal cancer detection rates among more than 3 million screening-eligible adults, our model estimates that at age 40 approximately 111 cancers would be detected per 100,000 screenings, compared with 159 per 100,000 screenings at age 45, the current recommended starting age. Based on the model, this equates to nearly 44% more 40-year-olds needing to be screened to detect one colorectal cancer (CRC) case compared to the number of 45-year-olds who would need to be screened.
  • However, men had consistently higher projected CRC detection rates than women across all ages. At age 40, an estimated 132 cancers would be detected per 100,000 screenings for men versus 98 for women.
  • Regional variation was also evident: the South had the highest projected detection rate at age 40 (128 per 100,000), while the West had the lowest (83 per 100,000).

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States.1 While overall CRC incidence has declined among older adults, rates have risen substantially in younger populations. Incidence among adults under 50 has increased by approximately 3% per year between 2013 and 2022, and CRC is now the leading cause of cancer death in adults under 50.1,2 This trend prompted the American Cancer Society to lower its recommended screening starting age from 50 to 45 in 2018,3 followed by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) in 2021.4 Since those changes, screening uptake among adults aged 45 to 49 has increased substantially, and recent data show a corresponding rise in early-stage CRC diagnoses in this group.5 Despite this progress, screening rates among newly eligible 45- to 49-year-olds remain the lowest of any eligible age group, and it remains unclear what detection yields would look like if the screening age were lowered further below 45. Understanding the projected rate of colorectal cancer cases at each year of age can inform ongoing discussions about the potential value and trade-offs of earlier screening.

We studied more than 3 million first-time CRC screening events among U.S. adults aged 45 to 59 who were screened after the October 2021 USPSTF recommendation change. Eligible screenings included colonoscopy, stool DNA tests, fecal immunochemical tests, fecal occult blood tests, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and CT colonography. Patients were excluded if they had a prior history of CRC, hereditary CRC syndromes, prior total colectomy, or a history of colorectal polyps. CRC was identified when a patient received two or more CRC diagnoses starting within 12 months of screening, with diagnoses less than 6 months apart; requiring two diagnoses helps distinguish confirmed cancers from rule-out evaluations where a single CRC code might appear during a diagnostic workup but cancer is ultimately not confirmed.

Because routine CRC screening is not currently recommended below age 45, colonoscopies in younger adults are generally not covered by insurance for screening purposes and are more likely performed to evaluate symptoms or elevated risk, which would inflate observed detection rates and make them unreliable as estimates of what routine screening would yield. To address this, we fit an exponential regression to the observed CRC detection rate by year of age from the screened population and extrapolated backward to project detection rates for ages 35 to 44.

First, we fit exponential curves to the rate of CRC detected by age among patients aged 45 to 59 and projected the trend to younger patients. We tested this methodology against the post-2021 USPSTF change trend: it estimated 180 cases per 100,000 at age 45, which is somewhat higher than the observed 160 per 100,000. Based on the model, this equates to nearly 44% more 40-year-olds needing to be screened to detect one colorectal cancer (CRC) case compared to the number of 45-year-olds who would need to be screened. See the PDF download for additional details.

Figure 1
Projected Colorectal Cancer Detection Rates for Routine Screenings Starting at Age 45
Projected Colorectal Cancer Detection Rates for Routine Screenings Starting at Age 45
Figure 1. The observed and projected number of detected CRC cases per 100,000 screenings.

We additionally fit the curve to the rate of CRC detected by age in sub-populations split by sex and region among patients aged 45 to 59 and projected the trend to younger ages. Our model projected a steady decline in CRC detection rates at younger ages. At age 45, around 159 cases of CRC are detected per 100,000 screenings, as seen in Figure 2. At age 40, the projected rate fell to 111 cases per 100,000 screenings, and at age 35, the rate dropped to 77 per 100,000. Men had a higher projected detection rate at every age: at age 40, the model estimated 132 cancers per 100,000 screenings for men compared with 98 for women. Regionally, the South had the highest projected detection rate at age 40 (128 per 100,000), while the West had the lowest (83 per 100,000). These regional differences persisted across the sex-by-region stratifications, with men in the South having the highest projected detection rate (151 per 100,000 at age 40) and women in the West the lowest (77 per 100,000 at age 40).

Figure 2
Projected Number of CRC Cases per 100,000 Screenings
Projected Number of CRC Cases per 100,000 Screenings
Figure 2. The estimated number of CRC cases per 100,000 screenings by age, sex, and geographic region.

These data come from Cosmos, a dataset created in collaboration with a community of Epic health systems representing more than 304 million patient records from 2,000 hospitals and more than 47,000 clinics from all 50 U.S. states, Canada, Lebanon, and Saudi Arabia. This study was completed by two teams that worked independently, each composed of a clinician and research scientist. The two teams came to similar conclusions. Graphics by Brian Olson.

References

  1. Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Star J, Kratzer TB, Smith RA, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2026. CA Cancer J Clin. 2026;76(2):e70067. doi:10.3322/caac.70067
  2. Sinicrope FA. Increasing incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(16):1547-1558. doi:10.1056/NEJMra2200869
  3. Wolf AMD, Fontham ETH, Church TR, et al. Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(4):250-281. doi:10.3322/caac.21457
  4. US Preventive Services Task Force; Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325(19):1965-1977. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.6238
  5. Schafer EJ, Sung H, Star J, Bandi P, Smith RA, Siegel RL. Colorectal cancer incidence in US adults after recommendations for earlier screening. JAMA. 2025;334(9):824-826. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.9147

Data Definitions

Study period
Study population: inclusion
Study population: exclusion
Colorectal cancer
CRC screening
CRC screening only
Ambiguous CRC screening
Screening encounter diagnosis
Colorectal polyps
Outpatient face-to-face encounter
Model specifications
Limitations